Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Ras Tanura Fire Follows Attacks on Aramco Offices and Near Shaybah Field
Coal is roughly 80% cheaper…
Global LNG importers face $39…
Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com
The top executives of U.S. energy startup Polar LNG have all resigned in recent weeks, just six months after the company was launched, amid a controversy over alleged funding and control of the venture’s strategy by Russia’s biggest LNG developer and exporter, privately-held Novatek.
The senior managers who left Polar LNG say they resigned in September after learning earlier during the month that Novatek was at least partly funding the U.S. company, which looks to build a project on Alaska’s North Slope.
Polar LNG was created in March 2026, pitching its proposed North Slope location as offering “one of the shortest shipping routes from North America to key Asian markets” to expand U.S. LNG exports to Asia.
Polar LNG also specifically said it “is not in competition with the proposed Alaska LNG pipeline. The North Slope contains far more gas than any single project can develop, and success depends on advancing multiple efforts in parallel.”
Polar LNG touted its investment proposition as a project that would use a modular gravity-based structure (GBS) to process and liquefy the gas directly at the source to accelerate construction and lower costs. The startup plans to buy an unfinished GBS from Novatek and has applied to the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to be authorized to do so.
U.S. authorization hasn’t been granted yet.
However, the former Polar LNG employees say they are concerned about potential violations of the U.S. sanctions on Russia. While the U.S. has not sanctioned Novatek, it blacklisted in 2023 Novatek’s Arctic LNG-2 project whose expansion has since stalled.
Joel Riddle, who resigned as CEO of Polar LNG in September, told the Financial Times last week that he discovered Novatek was actually calling the shots and providing capital to the project without approval from the Treasury’s OFAC or other agencies of the U.S. Administration. Related: EQT Bets on Record U.S. Gas Demand With $50 Billion Range Takeover
“I resigned as chief executive of Polar LNG because I felt uncomfortable that the Russian company Novatek was financing and ultimately controlling the strategic direction of the company,” Riddle told FT.
Furthermore, two former Polar LNG executives told The Wall Street Journal this weekend that senior executives at the company had shared concerns about Novatek’s role with the Administration in early September and that government officials had also expressed concern.
Abu Dhabi-based TechWave, an engineering firm, has provided capital to Polar LNG.
Bjorn Gundersen, a former executive at Novatek, is now at TechWave, sources with knowledge of the matter told the Journal.
During discussions about new funding for the U.S. project this summer, Riddle found out that Novatek was already financing Polar LNG and directing its operations before U.S. approvals were obtained.
Polar LNG last week issued a statement referring to the leadership change following “concerns regarding a disgruntled former employee, Joel Riddle.”
“Riddle was recently terminated from the company for cause. The company is investigating claims concerning Riddle that may result in litigation. To preserve the integrity of that process, the company will not comment further on the matters under discussion and asks other parties to exercise similar restraint,” Polar LNG said.
It added that “TechWave has provided financing to Polar LNG and initiated preliminary engineering work involving U.S. contractors. The project is seeking American investors and implementation partners.”
“Development activities are being pursued in full compliance with applicable U.S. laws,” said the U.S. start-up, which has submitted an application to OFAC “for a license authorizing the proposed purchase of an unfinished GBS from privately-owned Russian private company NOVATEK.”
There has been no progress in securing a license, various sources tell the Journal.
The alleged Russian funding and the potential sanctions threat could derail the Polar LNG project, which currently targets beginning natural gas deliveries “by the end of 2030, subject to securing necessary permits, financing, engineering and other development requirements.”
By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com
The Iran War Just Added $39 Billion to the World's LNG Bill
Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com
$120 Oil Is Almost Here, and Trump Has Few Good Options
Oil Prices Rise Despite Middle East Export Recovery
Trump Targets $6.2 Billion Offshore Wind Project Nearing Completion
Record Tanker Rates Cripple U.S. Crude Oil Flows to Asia
Chevron Moves to Take Over Russia's Most Prized Iraqi Oil Field
The materials provided on this Web site are for informational and educational purposes only and are not intended to provide tax, legal, or investment advice.
Nothing contained on the Web site shall be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or offer to buy or sell a security to any person in any jurisdiction.
Merchant of Record: A Media Solutions trading as Oilprice.com
Source: Oilprice