Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Click Here for 150+ Global Oil Prices
Turkey Unveils $500 Billion Energy Plan Built on Gas, Solar, Nuclear
The small-scale raids have targeted…
What I Cover
Irina Slav has been writing about global energy markets since 2007, covering the oil and gas industry, energy security, commodities, and the…
A majority of European Union citizens are in favor of an accelerated transition away from oil and gas and into alternative energy sources and transport electrification, a survey conducted by the European Investment Bank has shown, as reported by Reuters, which got an exclusive look at the survey.
According to the survey, which involved 23,000 respondents, 87% wanted governments to make the transition a priority, with 52% saying solar should be at the top of the list of alternative, low-carbon energy sources. Nuclear, on the other hand, had only 19% saying it should be prioritized. The percentage in favor of wind as a top alternative energy source stood at 37%.
“In a rapidly shifting geopolitical landscape, this is both the right thing to do for the planet and the smart thing to do for our economies, in order to bring down energy costs for businesses and households,” the president of EIB Group, Nadia Calvino, told Reuters.
Calvino’s second point is interesting because over the past decade since the Paris Agreement was signed, the EU member states that spent the most on wind, solar, and electric vehicle support saw their electricity prices rise the most as well, while transition laggards have managed to keep bills relatively affordable.
The war between the U.S., Israel, and Iran has highlighted the drawbacks of energy import dependence and strengthened the argument for locally sourced energy, especially from wind and solar installations, but also oil and gas where it is present.
Proponents argue that both of these, especially solar, are already cheaper than gas generation. Critics note the cost estimates for wind and solar are based on levelized cost of energy metrics that exclude a lot of actual costs, such as the cost of electricity that needs to come from a baseload generator when there is no sun or, indeed, wind.
By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com
Join the discussion | Back to homepage
Oil Prices Continue to Fall as Democratic Sweep Shakes Energy Markets
SOCAR Bets $1.65 Billion on U.S. Shale Gas Boom
What I Cover
Irina Slav has been writing about global energy markets since 2007, covering the oil and gas industry, energy security, commodities, and the…
Iran’s Oil Reserves Run Dry as U.S. Naval Blockade Tightens
6 Million Barrels in Two Minutes Draws CFTC Scrutiny
U.S. Offers Another 17 Million SPR Barrels as Fuel Crisis Deepens
US Crude Oil Inventories Buck Analyst Expectations
U.S. Dips Into Strategic Oil Reserve Again Amid Supply Disruptions
The materials provided on this Web site are for informational and educational purposes only and are not intended to provide tax, legal, or investment advice.
Nothing contained on the Web site shall be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or offer to buy or sell a security to any person in any jurisdiction.
Merchant of Record: A Media Solutions trading as Oilprice.com
Source: Oilprice